反腐败不是个好词儿不如说反违法反犯罪更不如什么都不说，谁违法犯罪就修理谁腐败，词典上解释 说，第一个意义就是腐烂的意思，例句：“不要吃腐烂的食物”“木材涂上油漆，可以防止腐败” 。第二个意义就是(思想)陈旧，(行为)堕落的意思，例如说某某是腐败分子。第三个意义是说 ，(制度、组织、机构、措施等)混乱、黑暗，例如说过去的政治腐败。有了上面这个讨论的基础 ，便不难看出，通常我们进行的反腐败，其腐败是取第二义的，也就是说，当党员、干部的思想已 经陈旧，行为已经堕落时，我们就说他们腐败了，就成为我们反对的对象。应该承认，这种反对在 理论上是完全必要的，党员也好，干部也罢，党员兼干部的就更不用说，他们必须是思想清正的， 行为廉洁的，不能腐败；可是，现实是复杂的，情况是多变的，形势是严峻的，所以，我们必须考 虑我们可以动用的反腐败的力量到底有多大，必须考虑我们这点力量能否反得动腐败。电影《青松 岭》里面有个角叫钱广，钱广有句名言，他说：“谁还没有点资本主义思想呢？”仿此说来，党员 干部们，谁还没有点陈旧思想和堕落行为呢？如果有陈旧思想，有堕落行为，就不分轻重缓急，就 一律反对，那你反去吧，法不责众，失败的一定是你。全国光党员就有六七千万之多，再加上非党 员干部，那数字有多少，够不够天文？而人非圣贤，孰能无过，如果思想陈旧一点就反，行为堕落 一点就反，你反得过来吗？必须看到，违法和犯罪是不同的行为，一般的腐败可能上限够到了违法 ，但是尚不是犯罪。如果我们反的是腐败，那么，我们就是用了高射炮对着天空一顿乱打，结果所 打击并没有多少犯罪行为，也没有多少违法行为。这是空耗炮弹，空劳军力。违法犯罪的党员干部 ，混杂在一般党员干部队伍里面，他们并不会因此受到致命打击。如果不反腐败，而是单纯反违法 ，反犯罪，那情形便相当不同。毕竟，大多数的党员干部是不会触及法律的，那么剩下的，那触及 法律的，只是少数、极少数。我们行动起来，就完全可以集中优势兵力，各个击破。不止如此，我 们还要看到，腐败与否，是不好判断的，而违法犯罪与否，则是比较容易判断的：腐败问题大体上 属于道德范畴，道不道德，本来就没有一个十分清晰的界线；而违法犯罪问题是腐败问题的子集， 范围大为缩小，并不难用国家通用的法律条文衡量。现在，让我们把思路理回去。我们会发现，反 腐败人为地扩大了我们的打击对象，而法是不责众的，也无法责众，所以也就难怪，我们收拾的贪 官，贪污数额一路高升。如果我们一开始，就光打老虎，放过苍蝇，那么极有可能，老虎早就成稀 有动物了。如果同时，我们再进行道德建设，那么极有可能，苍蝇也没有多少了。我们是否应该调整我们的打击思路，做到精准打击──只打击那些老虎？你有10发子弹，面对的是100个人，100个人中有10个违法犯罪分子，有80个道德上存有 或多或少问题的人，有10个是就连道德上也是无可挑剔的人。如果让你“消灭”违法犯罪分子， 以维护人群的秩序，而你竟然对着90个人开枪，那么10个违法犯罪分子可能要剩下9个！你只 是“消灭”了十分之一的违法犯罪分子，却让十分之九的违法犯罪分子逍遥法外！而理论上，你是 有10发子弹，如果措施得当，完全可以彻底“消灭”违法犯罪分子的！这个10发子弹的模型， 告诉我们，反腐败也许是个美丽的错误。不是一般的腐败不该反，而是两害相权取其轻，一般的腐 败造成的损失是小的，不妨暂且放他一马，而违法犯罪，才是重点打击目标。我们有限的子弹，一定要留给打击违法犯罪！......
Anti-corruption law is not a good word anti-crime, anti-better than anything that whoever criminal who repairs on corruption The dictionary says, a sense of meaning is decomposed, the example sentence : "Do not eat perishable food" and "wood and paints. can prevent corruption. " The second meaning is (thinking) outdated (behavior) degenerate meant, for example, that certain corrupt elements. The third meaning is that (systems, organizations, institutions, etc.) chaos and darkness, for example, that the past political corruption. With discussions on the basis of the above, one can easily see, it is usually the anti-corruption, corruption is the way to its second justice, In other words, party members, cadres ideologically obsolete act has been a crash, we say they are corrupt. We have become the subject of objections. We should admit that in theory it is absolutely necessary that the opposition party members or cadres themselves, let alone the party members and cadres. They must be thinking of the upright, honest behavior, not corruption; However, the reality is complex, the situation is changing. the situation is grave, therefore, we must consider that we can spend much of the anti-corruption forces in the end. This force, we must consider whether the anti-corruption move. "The pine Ridge," There were wide angle called money, money widely to be a saying, he said : "Who still somewhat capitalist ideology? "Imitation say, party members and cadres. Who still somewhat outdated thinking and depravity? If there is the old idea, depravity, regardless of priorities, it will be against you, then anything against France is not responsible for the masses. You must be a failure. National Party members have Luqiqianmo as light, coupled with non-party cadres, the figure number of astronomical enough? And the men are no saints, they would, if outdated thinking on the anti-point, the point on the anti - degenerate behavior, anti-you get through? It should be noted that violations of law and crimes are different, the general corruption may be enough to limit the offense, but is not yet a crime. If we are against corruption, then we are treated Cookin with guns in front of the sky. The results are not much to combat crime, there is no offense. This is intolerable shells, the military space workers. Crimes party cadres, which are mixed with ordinary party members and cadres that they will not suffer a fatal blow. If it does not fight against corruption, but simply anti-illegal, anti-crime, then the situation would be quite different. After all, themajority of party members and cadres are not touch the law, then left, then touched on the law, and only a few, a very small number. We swing into action, it is entirely possible to concentrate superior forces, each block. More than that, we must also realize that corruption or not, is bad judgment, criminal or otherwise, it is relatively easy to judge : largely moral corruption, immorality Road, it was not a very clear boundaries; The problem is the problem of corruption and criminal subset, significantly narrowing the scope, it is not difficult to measure with the national common law provisions. Now, let us go back to thinking Jimmy. We found that the anti-corruption artificially extended our targets, and is not responsible for the masses, the masses can select, So it's no wonder that we clean up corrupt officials, the amount of corruption continued to rise. If we start on-the tiger let fly, then most likely, the tiger has long become rare animals. If the same time, we have the moral construction, then most likely, not many of the flies. Whether we should adjust our thinking to combat, only against those who do precision striking ── tiger? You have 10 rounds of ammunition, in the face of over 100 individuals, 100 are 10 individual criminals. there are 80 more or less a moral issue, but there is a moral as well as an impeccable 10 people. If you "destroy" criminals, in order to maintain the crowd, and 90 individuals opened fire in front of you, Then ten criminals may be left nine! You only "destroy" one-tenth of criminals, while the remaining 90% of the criminals go unpunished! Theoretically, you have 10 rounds, if appropriate measures can completely "destroy" criminals! 10 rounds of this model tells us that the anti-corruption may be a beautiful mistake. Anti-corruption should not ordinary, but the lesser of two evils, the losses caused by corruption in general is small. He might put up a horse, and delinquency, is a key target for attack. Our limited bullets, we must crack down on law-breaking left! ......
More reviews about the 我为什么不喜欢“反腐败”